In what can often feel like a sea of dry scientific writing, provocative titles in scientific research papers stand out. Occasionally, legitimate scientists conducting good research will attempt more humorous titles. Sometimes, they even land! 

To highlight the joy of a jaunty paper title, our friends at Writefull, providers of AI-based research proofreading services, have developed a fun app to generate scientific paper titles based on article abstracts. When pondering paper titles, I wondered whether a disconnect between a paper’s abstract and its title could indicate a potential need to inspect the article for possible trust issues, and what better way to investigate it than to use their app!

And so, without further ado, or indeed statistical significance, I present three articles: 

Article 1: A (very not) scintillating title 

Human Created Title

An analysis of form and function of a research article between and within publishers and journals

Writefull’s Computer-Generated Title 

• Research Article Heading Organization and Forms for Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing: A Case Study from a Single Institution
• A Heading Form and Function Analysis for Machine Learning
• Research Article Heading Form and Function Analysis Using Rhetorical Functions

Picking an enticing article we just published at Ripeta about research article heading and subheadings, I wanted to see how close our paper name compared to those generated by a computer. Based on the alternative possibilities, the similarities of titles reassured me that we accurately framed our paper as dryly as possible, keeping in line with scientific naming conventions. Quite an interesting article when training machine learning algorithms to parse and categorize articles. However, definitely not click-bait.

Article 2: A title from an author trying to be clever (apologies Dr. Luke)

Human Created Title

Where there’s smoke there’s money: Tobacco industry campaign contributions and U.S. Congressional voting

Writefull’s Computer-Generated Title Possibilities

• Voting Behaviors of Representatives from the Tobacco Industry Political Action Committees in the United States: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
• The Effectiveness of Campaign Contributions for Tobacco-Related Legislators in the United States: A Cross-Sectional, Multilevel Model
• Voting Behavior of Tobacco Industry Political Action Committees

A search in Dimensions shows over 160 articles alluding to the proverb ‘Where there’s smoke’ in the title. Not that uncommon. Maybe even overused? From personal experience, Dr. Doug Luke enjoys using more flavourful titles for his papers and talks to make statistics sound as interesting as it really is. The generated titles compare favourably to the original segment after the academic colon.

Article 3: A provocative title (from a retracted article)

Human Created Title

The Safety of COVID-19 Vaccinations—We Should Rethink the Policy

Writefull’s Computer-Generated Title Possibilities

• Vaccine Safety and Risk Assessment for mRNA Vaccine COVID-19
• Vaccination of COVID-19: A Review of the Safety of Vaccines
• Safety Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccines: The mRNA Vaccination versus the Number Needed for Vaccination

The problem with this title is the authors put in a recommendation into the title, which plays on the boundaries of scientific cultural norms. In fact the term ‘rethink the policy’ appears in only a handful of article titles. More troublesome is that the recommendation in the title does not logically follow from the paper, as also reflected by the auto-generated titles given by Writefull. Before even considering the fraughtful methods of the paper, we know the title and substance of the paper don’t agree with each other.

Provocative paper titles remind us that, first, scientists are able to laugh at themselves a little, and second that the title itself could have a bearing on the readership and thus the exposure of the science within. Could there be a relationship between paper titles and trust? We’d love to hear your thoughts. Tweet us @ripetaReview.

Want to try your hand at the title generation app? Go to the Writefull Title Generator and let us know what you found @Writefullapp and @ripetaReview.

At Ripeta we will keep exploring and automating checks to make better science easier. To learn more, head to the Ripeta website or contact us at info@ripeta.com.

The post Provocative paper titles appeared first on Digital Science.

After months of developing, testing, and fine-tuning, we are thrilled to launch Writefull’s new language models.

Our new models take a big leap in language feedback – leaving other tools far behind in coverage and accuracy.

Writefull’s new models go beyond the fixing of individual words: they revise entire sentences. In addition to correcting grammar, spelling, vocabulary, punctuation, and style, they offer rewrites at the phrase- and sentence level. This means fixes in word order, word use, sentence structure, clarity, and more. All while still being trained on scientific papers, giving language feedback tailored to academic writing.

This advanced language check is available to all users of Writefull for Word on Mac, Windows 2016 and newer*, and Word Online. Simply select ‘Full Edit mode’ to see it in action. To get Writefull’s traditional language check of grammar, spelling, vocabulary, punctuation, and style, go for ‘Proofread’ instead – this mode is enabled by default. Where Proofread may suffice for a quick check, Full Edit gives you a more thorough copy editing-like service.

For both modes, freemium users get to see a subset of the suggestions, while premium members get unlimited use.

The post The next generation of language feedback appeared first on Digital Science.